|
PART 1 2
The Individual’s with Disabilities Education
Act (IDEA) indicates that a learning disability
is present when a student’s gap between
intellectual potential and academic achievement
is significant. In most states significance is
defined as a 1.5 - 2.0 standard deviation difference
between intellect and academic achievement. An
example is a 12 year old who has a measured IQ
of 115 who is reading at a third grade level.
Some states use
a 22 point difference between IQ and achievement
to determine significance. So, a student with
a 115 IQ, and a reading standard score of 93 would
be considered LD. This particular example brings
up an often misunderstood issue with learning
disabilities - even children who are above average
or gifted can have a learning disability. The
point to remember is that even though this student
is reading at a low average level, it is significantly
below his potential and is indicative of a learning
disability.
Another way to
think about a potential learning disability is
by looking at years delayed but, this method becomes
less helpful as a child gets older. This type
of red flagging is most helpful in primary and
maybe even middle school children when a 2 year
delay in development is significant. If you think
about a student who is 16, a 2 year delay is not
as significant and does not have the impact that
it has at a younger age. Remember though that
a diagnosis of LD comes from standardized evaluations
and not based on years of delay.
When determining
whether a learning disability is the reason for
delayed academic achievement, you must rule out
that the problem is related to sensory issues
such as vision and hearing. If the student has
vision problems that are resolved by wearing glasses,
then the vision problem does not make them eligible
for learning disabilities. If a child is visually
impaired or blind and glasses do not resolve the
problem the child may be eligible for Special
Education Services but not under the category
of learning disabilities. They may be eligible
under the category of blind/visually impaired.
A diagnosis is
only as good at the tests used. A diagnostic team
must be vigilant in choosing evaluation tools.
These instruments have to have good to excellent
reliability and validity. It is important to remember
evaluation results are going to label a child
for their entire academic career so, it is critical
that the highest standard for reliability and
validity are upheld in the selection of evaluation
instruments.
More
>>

|